![]() ![]() Lifetime HEPA filter (just rinse, dry and reuse).Was able to vacuum a large percentage of the house with the Dyson plugged into the same outlet. Dirt collection bin easily empties from the bottom with the push of a button.Dyson's proprietary root cyclone technology claims to never lose suction and picks up objects some vacuums wouldn't touch. While the Dyson isn't without it's faults (though none real significant) I thought I would give you a list of Pros/Cons we observed after using the Dyson over the course of the weekend: Pros: We had no idea how much dirt and debris the Oreck was missing. To get a sense of how much it picked up, I submit for your perusal, exhibit "A", a pic of the Dyson's dirt canister after we used it to vacuum the same area we just finished with the Oreck.Ī horrifying sight to say the least. I mean, I had just thoroughly vacuumed the carpet with what I thought was a top of the line Oreck vacuum, only to watch the Dyson's dirt canister quickly become full. We could immediately see that the Dyson was pulling up dirt, dog hair, and debris we couldn't even see in the carpet. My dear intraweb friends, let me tell you, there was no competition. But after spending $549 on the Dyson we were hoping that we would be able to see some kind of results. I took great care to make sure I did a thorough job of vacuuming with the Oreck, as I wanted to give the Dyson a run for it's money. This would allow us to see if the Dyson was able to pickup anything that the Oreck missed. We immediately laid down the gauntlet, I would start vacuuming the house with Oreck XL and the Head of the Culinary Arts Department would follow suit with the Dyson. the upstart challenger, the Dyson DC14 "animal". In the same house we had the current reigning vacuum champion, the Oreck XL vs. ![]() Upon arriving home we found ourselves in the midst of a great opportunity. We just hoped it "sucked" well enough to justify the expense. Now that we had it in our possession we were eager to get it home and immediately start using it (a wild and crazy Friday night, let me tell you). To make a long story short, we pulled the trigger and bought the Dyson. "$549 is a lot of money to spend on something you only use a few hours a week" we thought. Even armed with all that knowledge, we found that our trepidation concerning the price of the Dyson was the one factor holding us back. But being one that isn't easily swayed by marketing hoo-hah, or a quaint British inventor stating how he "just thinks things should work properly", we talked to friends that owned Dysons and read all the Dyson reviews on. Now, I've seen the commercials that claim how Dyson's never loose suction because of their patented, new-fangled sucking technology (technical description) which supposedly makes a Dyson superior to other vacuums. Though we were impressed by our loaner Oreck XL we've always had our eye on something else. After getting bitten in the ass for buying crappy $150 vacuums, we decided it was time cough up the cash to buy a quality vacuum. maintain suction for more than a couple of years). ![]() Our goal was to purchase a quality vacuum that would provide good value and stand the test of time (i.e. With so many different types and brands to chose from the decision was somewhat daunting. ![]() After just one session of using the Oreck we were definitely impressed, as it was a tremendous improvement upon what we previously used.īut the time had come to cease our vacuum mooching ways and begin the search for a new vacuum. (I remember my Father made the Oreck salesperson demonstrate this feat before they purchased their Oreck years ago). The Oreck is the 8 pound marvel we've all heard about on TV and radio over the years that has enough suction power to hold a 16 pound bowling ball in the mid air. Though the vacuum we received wasn't your average, run-of-the-mill vacuum, we were lucky, it was an Oreck XL which was in great condition. On the verge of being vacuum-less, this blog's in-laws stepped in to provide us a loaner vacuum until we could get something more permanent. The amount of suction it was producing was so poor it's attachment hose would barely hold on to the palm of an open hand, not to mention the visible dust the vacuum was exhausting while in use. Oreck: the vacuum cleaner showdownĪ few months back, our 5 year old Hoover bagless vacuum had become almost unusable. The blogiversary: One year and exactly a hundred posts later. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |